The West increasingly focuses on issues related to the effectiveness of the Russian electronic warfare team and US Electronic Warfare (based on published articles and publications). Thus, they (the West) translate Russian language publications (related to electronic warfare) and find ways to analyze it.
In the American interpretation of electronic warfare there are various “electronic warfare” (EW electronic warfare) “countermeasures, control and communication” (С3СМ- Command, Control, Communication countermeasure). “Electronic War” (Electronic Combat). But in essence, the problem remains the same.
In America, they compare our powers and their powers. And there are many compelling reasons to do it. Across the ocean (USA), highlights in the design and use of electronic warfare are highly acclaimed.
The problem was not the one that happened to Donald Cook, who in the case of American experts laughed out loud and made some very funny remarks.
But the results of using some of our (electronic warfare) combinations in Donbass (Ukraine) and Syria make no more American experts anymore.
Not only that, some of the respected and respected professionals immediately (their views are listened and appreciated by US officials) such as Roger N. McDermott, Sam Bendett, Michael Kofman. Even the Russian Electronic Combat Team is a formidable force and one that needs careful study.
From the point of view of the above-mentioned American experts, the Russian electronic combat teams are well-equipped and well-equipped, and the Russian Electronic Combat Team is a powerful force. the latest.
But the main thing – the electronic warfare team, derived from the Russian power-use theory, coordinated its actions with the actions of other military units. Air Force, Air Force, Artillery.
An equally important factor for Americans – is the years of combat experience that the Russian Electronic Corps soldiers have accumulated.
American expert Sam Bendett quoted a classic example of his report on the operation of Russian soldiers in Syria:
“The Russian army has observed 13 unmanned aircraft (UAVs), which immediately recognize these UAVs, then disable them with radio interference and collapse these UAVs.
UAVs who escaped these “fences” were destroyed by aircraft missiles, and as a result, the UAV attack has been completely broken. Obviously, Russia’s efforts to organize the joint operations of the electronic warfare with the anti-aircraft guards are positive. “
Modern electronic warfare devices not only increase the capabilities of military technology, but also allow Russian military personnel to make campaigns that do not make contact. and “pierce the drum,” blinded and the enemy lost all the fighting spirit.
And to do that (Russia) do not need to enter the NATO area. First, the Russian electronic warfare is very active (ray of impact), and in recent years Russia has created “gray zones”, the borders between the war blur and peace.
His point of view is interesting, and this point asks another question: what makes it difficult for you (Americans) to do the same thing as Russia?
In general, NATO can not stop the existence of these “gray areas” if there is no way of handling. But is it necessary? And why is there such a situation now?
In general, it is the subject of a long and demanding story that can not be told on one page.